Buildings and basements
Foundation concept, settlement compatibility, excavation and groundwater approach
Fault Marker
Geotechnical site investigation
Decision-makers who need scoped specialist evidence.
- Region
- Indonesia + Southeast Asia
- Delivery
- Online or by appointment
Services
Choose the evidence path that matches the project decision.
Road and rail corridors
Earthworks, pavement support, local instability, and drainage
Industrial sites
Heavy equipment support, fill history, utility routes, and staged construction
Slopes and retaining systems
Geometry, drainage, monitoring, and intervention sequence
Evidence
Project evidence stays reviewable from source to decision.
| Position | Survey reference, ground level, access condition, and location confidence. |
|---|---|
| Sequence | Depth intervals, recovery, drilling response, groundwater observations, and interruptions. |
| Specimen | Sample type, condition, preservation, custody, and test selection. |
| Limit | Coverage, timing, access, disturbance, correlation, and unobserved conditions. |
Controlled practice
Useful evidence has a stated source, method, and limit.
- Source
- Field position, sample condition, and test record remain traceable.
- Review
- Evidence is checked against the decision before a scope is fixed.
- Boundary
- Natural variability and conditions between observations remain explicit.
Method
A short, controlled project process.
- DiscoverConfirm the decision, records, constraints, access, and review date.
- PlanSet locations, methods, sampling, testing, monitoring, and hold points.
- AnalyseReview observations, sample quality, laboratory results, and ground-model confidence.
- ReviewCompare evidence against the project question and clarify limitations.
- HandoverIssue the factual record, interpreted findings, and decision-ready next steps.
Inquiry
Assemble a preliminary engagement brief.
Start with the decision context and evidence already available.
