Method / from question to handover

One sequence for a complex decision.

House 28 guides founders and family-enterprise leaders in Indonesia and Southeast Asia through five stages that keep the question, evidence, authority, and execution boundary clear.

Three advisors compare folders and decision blocks around a stone table.
METHOD / 05

Method / shared comparison

01 / Sequence

The method follows the decision, not a product.

Scale and cadence can change. The logical order remains: understand the question, map the material, compare paths, record the decision, then coordinate execution.

01

Orient

Clarify the decision, its owners, and what is already fixed.

02

Map

Separate facts, preferences, assumptions, dependencies, and open questions.

03

Compare

Place viable paths on one stable axis: control, flexibility, timing, and reversibility.

04

Record

Document the decision, rationale, conditions, dissent, and review date.

05

Coordinate

Hand each execution question to the appointed legal, tax, banking, or investment specialist.

A hand turns an unmarked page in a deep teal decision-record folio.
OUTPUT / RECORD

Output / decision record

Working output

A record the family and its appointed advisors can use.

  • 01 / Decision statement
  • 02 / Stakeholder and decision-rights map
  • 03 / Fact, assumption, and question register
  • 04 / Path and condition comparison
  • 05 / Decision and review record
  • 06 / Specialist handover map
Build an advisory brief

What happens at each boundary.

Information boundary
Information needs are defined before sensitive documents are exchanged.
Decision boundary
Authorized people and the review forum are recorded before comparison begins.
Advisory boundary
Legal, tax, banking, and investment questions pass to appointed professionals.
Time boundary
A decision has conditions and a review date rather than being treated as permanent.